| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Circumstantial Evidence
179
   |
Posted - 2015.05.20 22:11:48 -
[1] - Quote
Will BPC / BPO's for 50mm plates be converted to Storyline BPO, or regular 100mm BPO? |
Circumstantial Evidence
179
|
Posted - 2015.05.20 23:55:27 -
[2] - Quote
Ripard Teg wrote:Guys! You have a serious opportunity here to make Small Shield Extenders not useless! Please don't let it go by!
I have a dream. It is not a big dream. It is a small dream. In my dream, Small Shield Extenders are a good option for frigates and Medium Shield Extenders are a good option for cruisers. Must I abandon my dream? Hmm. Do you mean to suggest a complete rethink, so that small parts only fit on small ships, or just additional thought on the stats for extenders?
When I started EVE, I thought small parts went on small ships. After a while, I discovered the part size class names (S/M/L) had little to do with what ship size class they fit on. |
Circumstantial Evidence
181
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 22:29:37 -
[3] - Quote
The train has left the station on this tiericide concept, they have held to this same methodology since the first couple parts sets were refined. I appreciate that they are taking it just a few module groups at a time, because the feedback thread would be insane if they dumped a giant spreadsheet full of module group changes for every part on us, all at once. Ship balancing never ends, and so to, with module balancing. |
Circumstantial Evidence
181
|
Posted - 2015.05.22 22:55:14 -
[4] - Quote
Casivek Andrard wrote:Non sense look at the Ishtar, they refuse to fix the issue... They did change some stats on the Ishtar fairly recently, just not as much as a lot of people wished for. I was thinking of the Sentry thread, as I wrote the above 
|
Circumstantial Evidence
181
|
Posted - 2015.05.23 05:09:33 -
[5] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:It makes far more sense to keep the compact/restrained part of the name and get rid of the old flavor names. ..... I would prefer to see simpler and shorter names. I kind of agree, but also was one of many who missed the old flavor names. Perhaps they could be buried in description text. Still, I like many of the flavor names. They help with market searches, due to their uniqueness.
|
| |
|